Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 09:34
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sega Throws Shade At Mario Kart While Showing Off Sonic Racing: Crossworlds - Kotaku
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
My Girlfriend Had a Legendary Sex Life Before Me. No One Will Let Me Forget It. - Slate Magazine
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
The Fastest Speed That Humans Have Traveled Is 39,937.7 Kilometers Per Hour - IFLScience
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What’s next?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Water Discovered Around a Young, Sun-Like Star For First Time - ScienceAlert
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
PSA: You Probably Don't Need To Be Weighed At The Doctor's Office - HuffPost
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
The Club World Cup is finally up and running — and soccer may never be the same - AP News
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.